Real work. Redacted evidence.
No raw data dumps and no manufactured success stories. Each case shows the research question, evidence scope, key judgment, and practical deliverable.
Research cases
- 01
US water-filter supplier screening
A sourcing study that used shipment activity to narrow a broad supplier market into companies worth verifying.
Read the full case1,091Trade records≈310Supplier names - 02
Multi-source PCB market intelligence
Trade records, market search language, and competitor visibility were brought into one evidence framework.
Read the full case27,000+Aggregated trade records1,000Detailed trade sample - 03
Powder-coating buyer intelligence
A competitor-derived buyer universe was turned into a prioritized, evidence-led outreach list.
Read the full case3 yearsTrade window256Detailed records - 04
Vietnam medical market map
Buyer-side and China-supplier-side evidence were reviewed together in a category with inconsistent naming.
Read the full case1,387Buyer-side records1,367Supplier-side records
How to read these cases.
Record volume describes the research universe. The real value is cleaning, verification, and a defensible priority decision.
- Evidence
- Show what was actually analyzed instead of displaying a tool interface.
- Judgment
- Explain why a company matters while preserving uncertainty and evidence gaps.
- Privacy
- Company and contact information is redacted by default.
- Outcome boundary
- Research proves analytical work, not replies, inquiries, or sales.
Have a market question that needs evidence?
Share the product, target country, and decision you need to make. I will confirm whether reliable evidence is available before scoping the work.
